Forward with Freedom and the Future of Gianfranco Fini
Dear friends and dear friends of Mirabello, every time I got to take the floor in this small country that is dear to me for many reasons, each time, I have always felt a certain emotion. For reasons known, because here the roots of a part of my family, because here years ago, a man certainly capable of looking ahead, he pointed his people the necessity of a generation leap. And I think the presence here of a man like Mirko Tremaglia is the best demonstration of that idea and continuity. Mirabello as a place - for many of us - the emotions, that over time, MSA National Alliance, were renewed. Here the Italian right has experienced important moments. Here, with Pinuccio Tatarella, we announced An. Here, predicted that further turning point that led to the PDL. But every time, believe me, emotion is the one yesterday. But I think ever in my heart there was a strong emotion that I feel like that now. This festival of 2010, an event important for the whole of Italian politics, not only for the PDL. Mirabello is a day for the capital of Italian politics. And I think, dear Vittorio Lodi, this is the best gift you can do: a date for national policy. Sincere thanks to Victor, to all men and women who have joined us from across the country. It is the demonstration of a people who are here, why not enlisted, but he feels a deep desire to participate, to regain political engagement, marked by some values. A nation of men and women to be found. I hope this place gives me strength, and I thank you, at this time of difficulty can be an opportunity for me to make a contribution to clarify what happened and what will happen. What happened this summer? Do not you realize if you do not go back to July 29. When the Political Bureau of the PDL, after a meeting lasting two hours, in my absence, I was actually ousted from the party, which I helped found, representing the Italian right. At the end of this meeting has approved a document that is written that our policy was a continuous drip, often in harmony with the opposition and the themes of the Left, and participation - this makes you laugh - with the action of proxies. So Fini would not be consistent with the principles of the PDL. And then, to make clear there was no leakage, any kind of division, no attitude tended to break down. In fact, a deeply illiberal act that has nothing to do with its pluralism of a liberal party. An act I have no difficulty in saying that perhaps that was inspired by Black Book of Communism that was given at the Congress of An, a Stalinist-style act. That document was a brutal assault on dissent, tended to cancel each type of diversity. And then we reason, we should ask. In what has been called "party of love" is possible to take criticism? For my part, there were, we also made proposals. You can say, for example, that in the face of a government that has done well in some respects the crisis, perhaps they could modulate in a different way to spend those linear cuts that led to two high profile protests. I was injured, for example, when in Venice I saw the police show their disapproval.
I think he deserves respect for every manager, every citizen affected by the cuts that were made, and I think the budget cuts to school, because of the protest of the precarious still do not know if in a few days will be the chair. Demolition is not a criticism. Then, you may criticizing, expressing doubts? Like those in respect of fiscal federalism, not in himself but because of how it is implemented. Fiscal federalism is a great opportunity for Italy, of course, but at some point it appeared that did not. I know that perspectives are not shared by all. But I have consciously made. For example, when it comes to combat illegal immigration must also talk about integration of immigrants honest. And yet, the guarantor is a sacrosanct principle, but never, ever be considered a sort of impunity permanent guarantee of the accused, of course, but the processes must take place. All this is heresy, and defeatism? It is dripping polemical point out that the judiciary is a cornerstone of democracy? You can not because of some bad apple that remains a challenge defense of our Republic. It's a trickle to say that we are a great national party, and that just because everyone should have at heart, from Innsbruck to Lampedusa, can not lie flat on an ally like the League that has local dimension? Why settle for one thousand milk producers overshoot their quota just to please Bossi at the expense of so many honest farmers? The PDL had to be a great national party, a great Western party. With specific reference values: freedom, respect and human dignity. And if I had not been expelled from the PDL would have told you what I say now: that of Gaddafi in Rome, a character that has nothing to teach us, it was an unseemly spectacle. As a former foreign minister know the reasons of realpolitik, can also get to say that there may be a portion of the logic of realpolitik national interests. But this can not lead to a kind of genuflection. So, still, you can say within the PDL, as I said before, that there is a definite must for those who have institutional responsibilities, to respect the other institutions? When the premier asked that it be granted due respect, he must recognize the other, above the head of state representing the Constitution. And we must respect the Parliament, which is an annex of the executive. And I say that as chairman of the House, but because the powers must be balanced. You say that to govern is dripping a noble and arduous undertaking, but can never mean control? Yes, because grooming is to understand the reasons for all and ensure balance. And always to be clear: it was dripping, provocation, boycott, stressing that the PDL should be guaranteed to complete major economic and institutional reforms? True, the crisis was an obstacle. But because we no longer speak of a major reform to give birth to the dawn of a new republic? We had designed the PDL to maintain the existing, but as a force for truth and authentic change.
And, again, was proof of preconceived hostility to reiterate that at this stage of crisis - which is even more essential commitment to a policy with more attention to social issues - to promote the revolution of merit that should not become an election commitment, but a political act achieved a daily basis to give priority to those most capable. And I think they have a right to put questions to my political community too uncomfortable and I do not think this merits the gesture of those who bothered them says incompatible with the political attitude. The Prime Minister, I say this without irony, has many merits, but also some flaws: first, to not understand that in a democracy there can be no heresy. We are all grateful for what he did in '94, for defeating the so-called war machine, but the gratitude does not imply that there can be no comparison, that the distinction should be charged with treason, because we are not a nation of subjects. I will have challenged its ability to confuse leadership with what is the attitude of the owner of a company. Precisely because the PDL has opened horizons of great hope, can not be declassified in the leading edge, but should be a source of ideas, a lung that breathes and gives oxygen to the entire nation. Claiming the opportunity to express opinions is not a boycott but internal democracy, the physiology of a mass party, no theater of politics. It is possible that the only time that has met the leadership of the PDL has marked the time to initiate the process leading up to July 29? Day that is not deemed to affect my person, but a great party that is the PDL and is based on democracy.
Continue in this internal dialogue does not mean betraying the voters because there are many, many moderate voters of the PDL genuinely not satisfied with the affirmation that "we are the party of moderates." There are very many voters convinced that the reason the PDL before the policy is to ensure the general interest of the polis, the national interest, not the interest of a party. There are people who do not understand why the PDL instead of working to unite, to share work, to raise the stakes, to determine conflicts. Here is the truly national
PDL. Of course, these voters of the PDL is in many cases women and men who voted the National Alliance, but not all. I am electorate of other political traditions. And we've got the evidence after the expulsion, when they consist of groups of future and freedom. They joined the men and women who had not had anything to do with the political tradition. The
want to do is to thank those Members who had never been in Mirabello. An Fli is not in the sixteenth. Who does not think he understood anything at all. Here is the difficult but necessary attempt not to lose that dream. We must give answers to the many women and many men that not even read the most pages of the policy, which feed on nuisance for newscasts and newspapers that appear to be photocopies. The country is growing detachment from politics. Fli, as a reference point for many voters in the last election abstained or maybe in the next administration without an alternative, would refrain. Voters are telling us to go forward, trying to defend not only our good reasons, but the original principles, the most authentic of the PDL, which ask us to create a good policy, which is the only antidote to the growing mistrust in institutions. When many people lose faith in politics is the eve of moments that may be more problematic. The PDL, as we had planned and wanted, ended July 29 because it was no longer wish to give life to that exchange of ideas that is the spice of democracy. The PDL is gone, there is now the party of the step. In some ways that the PDL is Strength Italy has widened with some colonel or captain who has just changed and maybe the general is ready to change again. And the fact that the PDL is gone is the reason why is easy to answer the question: what will happen? And it is much easier to answer if we think, rather than if you take the desires or fears. Fli may not return to what is no more, will not happen. We do not enter into what is no more, you go forward with our ideas, our commitment, our policy development. Do not we retire to a convent or err Rangers waiting to forgive.
parliamentary groups can not be processed - Berlusconi is a man of spirit and will not if - as if they were customers of the stand, if they change the supermarket which hitherto have used then get the loyalty bonus. The parliamentarians who are with us they want to do politics, talking with people. We go forward with our ideas, our proposals, it goes without being intimidated by what has been called the "method Boffo" fielded in the last month by some newspapers that should be the calling card of so-called party of love. And if this is the bad habit, imagine if they were not loving what could happen. Let us not be intimidated because of intimidation we have experienced very different in years when the threat to the right were quite different. Let us not be intimidated by paranoid and pathetic campaign. Indecent because paranoid and pathetic because they are not aware of the contempt that is mounting around.
We look forward to feedback from the judiciary, who will say and determine those responsible for a lot of vulgarity, of so many lies and falsehoods. Other than the values \u200b\u200bof freedom. It was a disgraceful attitude, not because it addressed to my person, but to my family, and is typical of the infamous. It goes on and you do to keep faith with the spirit of its origins, it goes on not to betray the spirit of the PDL, we go forward to keep the government commit other errors, you go ahead - and if you take away from the head - without changes in the field without reversals and drop, because from this point of view, the controversies are a sign of the low level of understanding. It goes convinced, as we are, the need to complete the written agreement with the voters, not to mention part of the program, without inventing other things which then become, at will, emergencies. It goes on even when the President of the Council will present the pact of the five points - the reform of justice, the South, federalism, taxes and security - it is obvious that our leaders will speak and speak loud and clear without any distinction between hawks and doves, because we do not interested in ornithology.
And Parliamentary Future and freedom, if they want to restore dignity and spirit of what was to implement the project of the PDL, may object to the tenets of the program? And then we will support women and men free program. But I think that it can not be denied to us as to any congressman or senator of the majority, to ask how to link these objectives of the program. Ask a constructive spirit how you want to create this program. Fli not pulling against, but it is the political action of those who want to walk fast to profitably re-establishing the government in a good relationship with public opinion (because there are some signs of fatigue, my friends, not polls or surveys). We will try to create a pact term, therefore, to fill with concrete facts that separate us from the years when we go to the polls. It is a "national interest", and therefore we believe it is political adventurism threatens every other day and the other elections as well, perhaps to intimidate and perhaps to settle the score with someone. Governing is hard work, trust in the sense of responsibility of all, no exceptions. Why the failure of this term would be a failure for all: for me, Fli, for Berlusconi. And I think he is conscious Berlusconi. Why so many expressions beyond controversy, when you get a trust so great and you get a parliamentary majority as it had never happened in the history of the Republic, the first thing to do is put the door on those who dissent or maybe it's unpleasant, but govern. We are confident that a deal laying the legislature to ensure the legislature. And I think also being aware of Bossi and the League. Bossi understands the moods of the people, is a popular leader. We polemicized is often true. Only those who do not know history, as well as geography may think Padania that exists for real! Bossi has understood that the flag raised for first years, even picking up the irony and skepticism of many, federalism may be a flag raising, which would lead to the fulfillment of that historic mission that Bossi has given to his movement . But federalism is only possible if it is in all of Italy. Bossi is real man, knows that the North needs of federalism as long as it is in the public interest. And I can safely say that the bicameral committee of thirty members for fiscal federalism, our Senator Baldassarri is crucial. Then, we discuss along with the League and Forza Italy, which enlarged Federalism means fair. It's a great question that is not reduced to the ratio of Calderoli and Tremonti. It can be realized as long as you establish standard costs.
The South has everything to gain from a reform in the federal sense, which is essential to evaluate the standard costs in the regions, because no one can argue that the costs in Emilia Romagna are not the same as those in Calabria. No one defends the historical spending, the one under which the government could be seen to pay their expenses at the foot of the list, but the definition of the parameters of expenditure can not be discussed, as they should discuss the timing of federalism or of what it means equalization fund. Even more so, With this reform, we must be worthy of an anniversary, the celebration of 150 years of Italian unity, which must be not only the reconstruction of the historical times, but the opportunity for a national reform, which does not leave behind some regions, that does not reflect Part of selfishness to the detriment of all. Italy is not only an indivisible interest in the South, but also in the North. And just see what happens outside our nation occorgersi that if the crisis shakes Greece, Germany, Padania certainly can not survive the crisis of a single European country or overlooking the Mediterranean. Italy has the duty to confirm its unity and to compete with other countries. Has a duty to establish a new covenant of term, it is no longer a table with two legs, or a managed retirement agreement.
But what happened to that point in the program with which you were taking the applause on the abolition of the provinces? What happened to that point in the program which included the privatization of municipal? It was enough to understand that in some areas became the treasure of a party to bring the League to the Italian left. The new pact term is no longer just between Berlusconi and Bossi, but in everyone's interest, but also of the League of Silvio Berlusconi. I am convinced that the realism and pragmatism will put aside the stigma, because we do not stop. Needless to say, "do what they want," because we will. They serve no ultimatums because not scare us. Silvio Berlusconi has sacrosantodiritto to govern, because it has been unequivocally chosen by the voters and I have no difficulty saying that to think of judicial shortcuts for turning him out, would represent a betrayal of the democratic will. Nobody is against the Alfano Bill or such failure. We are convinced that we need to answer the question of law that Berlusconi to govern without any interference from iperpoliticizzati segments of the judiciary who want to put him offside. Refer to Dr. Strangelove - that is Mr Ghedini - is incomprehensible. The solution is never found and the problem becomes acute. It should not be made a law ad personam damage the company, but a law to protect the head of government, the head of state that exists in many European countries.
That does not mean impunity, does not mean delete processes, but the suspension of the same. And we do try to have in mind that some reforms are right: how can you be opposed to the process short? You have to work for and what we remember about that the EU has repeatedly condemned for the excessive length, it takes years to know how it ends. But what is not acceptable is that once that the text came from the Senate with the risk that distorts when many victims are waiting to know the fate of the process then let them empty-handed in his hand. The reform must be made to ensure the citizens. Justice reform can not be made against the judiciary, which certainly did not interfere with the task of the parliament. Then we discuss in the parliament, how to ensure the right to rule on Berlusconi, also discuss with the parties most responsible for the opposition: a demonstration of this was given by Casini. Discuss also the proposals arising from the opposition, without the diligent prince's advisers have been great as that of the lawyer Sheehan. Let justice reform without result in an enduring short circuit between the political power and the judiciary. It is a huge undertaking, difficult, however, that we must pursue. If sovereignty belongs to the people, sovereignty is expressed many ways. Here we want to revive a proposal for one of those who say "Fini said things that bring him close to the left of" popular sovereignty also means that people have the right to choose their own representatives. If sovereignty is popular belief that people have the right to choose, too. Federalism and justice are major issues, but I can not: not to be the only topics of discussion. Why the focus of Italians is not directed only to justice today many Italians are worried about economic conditions.
The Italians in North and South are concerned about the economic and social conditions for the work: it is not propaganda or demagoguery, or "to do" opposition. Are the problems of families. Fli must do everything to assist the two main themes of federalism and other justice issues that really matter to citizens. We should remember what they said the head of state, businesses, workers. Possible that in the 5-point there is nothing to jump-start the economy and make it competitive? Italy there is a concern. And Berlusconi is right when he speaks of optimism, but optimism can not be only verbal, must be turned into practical action. Why stop the crisis (and our government has done good in this sense), now we have to put the economy. We can not guarantee that the revenues are satisfied with the economy. You need the political courage to restore life to those reforms that were in the original program of the PDL and not hear about, for example, the overcoming of the two false myths of the twentieth century, class struggle and the Mercat. The time has come to give life to a synthesis, a new pact between capital and labor: producing wealth: putting on the same side of the fence. A proposal that I made at the national leadership and that is fall into nothingness, is a reform of the labor market. We need a policy that understands the needs of our manufacturing world. Small businesses know better than anyone. It is important to remember that the manufacturing base is different from other countries, is based on small and medium enterprises. It cuts the superfluous, but do not skimp on infrastructure, in research, production of cutting-edge excellence. We live in a time when the cultural deposits worth more - in globalization - the oil fields. We have to invest, although it is clear that the deck is short. It would be easy to say "the government pull out of resources". But we all go from unhappy to say that there is one area on which you have to invest, and is connected to the industry that can give competition to our production system. Especially for our businesses that export is not enough to think about the relocation of businesses, but one who wants to attract capital and put in a position to open un'impesa. Means to implement the key points of the PDL Program. I do not want to sink the knife through butter, but I think despite the ghe, it seems possible that you still do not know the name of Minister for Economic Development, in what other country would be possible?
is clear that a minister must be able to reason and work with the Minister of Economy. And it is clear that a policy capable of liberalization, a policy that can give life to the pact between generations. Because I think there is another major area in which a center-right government that cares about the national government should not spare himself: it is the youth, in fact there is no parent worthy of the name that is not willing to make a personal sacrifice for the future of their children.
The youth question is central, and I cry my heart that there is among young people unemployed out of four. There are those who smuggle the flexibility that is needed for the economy and businesses, with the permanent insecurity: they forget that in Germany there are so many fixed-term contracts, but there the salaries are not sure how to read by us, but often more substantial than those of permanent contracts. And we must realize that the pact generazionele is as important as the one between North and South if we care about the national government.
it is not right to serve the help of his grandfather for his grandson to live more peaceful: it has completely turned the world before it was often thanks to the work of his nephew who claimed his grandfather.
Poniamoceli these problems. We ask a commitment to children and when I say we go and we do not stop, I say this because in recent weeks we have seen how the young to say "try it, do not stop, we are with you." I think it's very nice to see here tonight many girls and many boys who still want to believe in a policy that can build their future. The future of freedom. And the first freedom and enable them to see what they are capable. What happened to the meritocratic revolution. Worry about social conditions. I think that should cause concern to all who read the so-called social spending in our country is one of the last countries in Europe. Why go ahead and Future of freedom, because they are the foundations that have served to fill a void? You must ask ourselves as the company has changed dramatically, social spending should be given to those categories traditionally weaker or is not the time to invest in the family that remains the place where it always gives rise to the transmission of values, you create the condition for which you feel the children of a community? A welfare opportunities for young people, based on the needs of families, especially single-income. Today, the center must be able to translate into reality what had been included in the government program. Intervening with
with policies that support families, it also means that if the five points is the reduction of the tax burden we can not just announce it but you have to assume the honor to make suggestions. And we have made these are: to act as the so-called family-quotient, which face is that those who have more children at home or a disabled person then has a tax burden different from others. And it is necessary that everything we talk about it in parliament, and I am glad that he did such Minister Tremonti. And let's also trying to involve the opposition, if you have ideas, to understand even if the concept of national interest has also made inroads there. Greater social justice is the heart to all, big government knows how to take a good idea even if the opposition. We take this collection to Italy that works. Italy that works, then that is equivalent to Italy honest, that when they hear about the ethics of duty does not have the attitude of those who shrugs and says, "is web of the past. " It is the ethic that the father teaches his son, and policy needs to feel the duty to practice. Along with the civic sense. Enough of this selfishness spread, enough of this fragmented Italy, which is not near the interressa
... The spirit, the sense of belonging. Enough of this selfishness spread, with Italy this fragmented that no longer charged to the distress of their neighbors. A national policy is not afraid to speak of law as a guarantee for the weak. Because from that world to the world if you say that "the law is equal for all", because the guarantee is for the weak, not the most powerful, who can bend it to his interests. Questoè the center. If we believe in these things, do not tire of thanking those who does his duty for the state: and gratitude, and citizenship. Being servants of the state, in Italy we dream, it must be a cause of honor can not be said that "they are poor who do not know what else to do and then decide to enter the police" means to serve our people, our homeland. And even more convinced than ever, we continue the fight against all forms of crime, including white-collar, wide boys of the neighborhood, who thinks he is granted impunity. Contnuiamo the struggle for the rule of law, re-launched anti-corruption ildecreto: what costs it back in the spotlight Parliament? We discuss the advisability of establishing a code of ethics for those who have public positions. By establishing what is legal and what not, but also what is appropriate and what is not. On these and other issues, we work to unite not to divide. On these issues we try to create a policy that marks a quantum leap. The Italians are tired of this perpetual campaign that never ends, this triumph of propaganda, this daily ordeal. Fli we are looking forward to join, we are convinced that these issues, a political action that starts from the center you can find others as well. The Italians are tired of walls and fights, let's stop with the insults, with appeals falling on deaf ears. We set up a policy that is capable of a burst of pride, a step in the kidneys, in the name of what is right, not what is useful. You know, many have told me: "Who you do it? But wait, you're younger. " But I believe that if we want to give Italy the passion it deserves, then enough of utilitarianism, with the logic of better tomorrow ... today
utilitarianism Enough, enough with the calculation of the pharmacist, just to wait for better tomorrow. We must throw your heart over the obstacle, you have to make sense of politics and it must be done in the name of our ideas and our conception of politics. Recalling that we had the heart to 18-20 years, when none of us thought at the entrance to Parliament or institutional positions and no one had moved from utilitarianism, nor was there anyone who said 'you should not expect, you know it is touchy. " Bearing in mind, as we like to say to young people, that if a man is not willing to fight for their ideas or their ideas are worth nothing or no value him as a man. Then, in the name of a truly liberal center-right National reformer, social, European, and freedom ahead with the Future in Italy!
Full text of speech on the occasion of the Feast tricolor, Mirabello, September 5, 2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment